Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is obvious that today, global warming has aroused considerable public debate about its consequences. Facing this issue, many people argue that we should accept it rather than fighting against it. Although the idea of coexistence between human and climate change appears plausible, I advocate the opposite view.
The idea of living with climate change can seek supports from some arguments below. First, since climate change is a part of the nature, many people believe that human is not strong enough to resist the laws of nature. A clear example to illustrate this point is Japan, where people have to cope with many natural hazards every year such as earthquakes and tsunami. After all years, all the effort to fight against these natural forces seem in vain, which implies that we human are only a tiny species in facing the vigorous power of the nature. Second, by harness the advancements of technology, many supporters suggest that it is straightforward to live with this phenomenon. For example, although unable to combat, people these days are able to predict and minimize the most detrimental impacts of the coming storms thanks to geo-technology, saving millions of lives.
However, there are a whole host of reasons why human should combat global warming in lieu of co-living with it. First, coexistence with climate change does equal to the degradation of human health. Since the alarming rate of carbon and chemical toxics leads to the development of many diseases such as skin and respiratory disease, human health and well-being will be definitely affected. Not to mention, this climate crisis also triggers ice-melting, leading to sea encroachment. For instance, in coastal areas such as Vietnam and The Philippines, this phenomenon runs the risk of losing living space and shelter for daily and economic activities, which causes many trials and tribulations for human.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that we should fight against climate change and find solutions for its problems instead of living together with it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... lives. However, there are a whole host of reasons why human should combat glob...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y trials and tribulations for human. In conclusion, I firmly believe that we ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, well, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24924012158 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67698167918 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58358662614 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0930186875 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.133333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185751303513 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685124008083 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608914470389 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138574898817 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657867713789 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.