Many employees prefer working from home using modern technologies. However, the employers don't consider it as a benefit. Discuss both points and give your own opinion with relevant examples from your experience.
Nowadays, working from home has prevailed among employees.
Some people raise a question about the necessity of such a phenomenon. However, workers should be required to pursue telecommuting rather than toiling at a company in order to their flexibility.
It is considered to be no advantages in working at home.
That is because there are a lot of distractions that make it hard to people concentrate on. For example, they may do smartphone, lying on a sofa, meet their friends on their's own authority or doing delayed household chores. Therefore, it is impracticable to do the task if they have no strong self-discipline that could supervisor themselves.
On the other hand, telecommuting has some benefits to employees.
For the reason that they are able to adjust the time based on their schedule. For instance, when something special happens, they can accomplish their work an ahead of time. Plus, it can achieve more productive results. Originally, the home space provides a comfortable atmosphere so that staff doesn't need to have feelings of conscious and it is possible to release stress caused by heavy traffic jam everyday mornings. To summarize, telecommuting is the optimal way for them.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against doing work at home. But it certainly deserves a cozy environment for its employees. Thus I am convinced that this system should be targeted for them. Furthermore, this will increase the morale of the staffs and grow the profit of the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they may do smartphone, lying on a sofa, meet their friends on theirs own authori...
^^
Line 8, column 296, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... a comfortable atmosphere so that staff doesnt need to have feelings of conscious and ...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 152, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s a cozy environment for its employees. Thus I am convinced that this system should ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17813765182 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02999045722 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63967611336 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2904989894 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2352941176 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5294117647 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083372674268 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292195783267 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466763437939 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586166399189 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526552038988 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.