Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home.
As a result, employees will have much more flexible working hours in the future. Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true fact to consider that various benefits are given by employers to their employees, nowadays. The major benefit is allowing them to work from home instead to perform duties from office. In my opinion, it is more prolific for the employees working from home. This essay will discuss how employees gain benefit.
The first and foremost positive point is that employees save their traveling time and money when they perform their official duties from home as too much time and amount is spent by them in traveling from home to office. Firstly, if they save their traveling time, they can be more productive, and they can also provide enormous benefits to their employers. Secondly, if they will not travel daily, they can save their traveling expense also. For example, a recent survey report reveals that so many employees work from their home in USA, and they all reported that they has saved not only saved huge amount of money but also produced more units of products than past years.
In addition to this, it is also believed that employees stay in harmony with their family members when they work from home. They can share their love and affection with their children, thereby; they can enjoy their life without any stress. For instance, A UN report of 2018 clearly shows that employees who work from home are more happy and prosperous in their life than those who go daily to office.
In the end, it is concluded that employees who work from home get umpteen benefits while working from home. Therefore, I firmly agree that it is a lucrative development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
..., they can save their traveling expense also. For example, a recent survey report re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...in USA, and they all reported that they has saved not only saved huge amount of mon...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82656826568 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26579684076 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516605166052 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6936301358 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328259650795 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146004735784 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902275001395 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240651263121 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042950445287 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.