Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

A nation has different expectations from its government. Although economic growth is regarded as the most profound mission by many governments, in my opinion, authorities need to attempt to making progress in other areas, as well.

It has argued by the majority of governments that financial progress would be the key to addressing the paramount difficulties of the country. At a large scale, construction or even modernization of a country's infrastructures, which are big-budget projects, is highly unlikely with a weak economy. For instance, the efficiency of sewage networks, powerful stations, medical facilities has incredibly relied on their constant developments through renovation plans. The individuals would benefit from a strong economy. That unemployment, family breakdown, psychological problems, conviction and, etc are consequences of a depressed economic condition is a disputable fact.

Undoubtedly, the prosperity of a country is not limited to its material possession, and the definition of welfare has comprised more items that their promoting requires the government contribution. Firstly, addressing environmental issues is one further crucial responsibility of the government. Many developed cities throughout the world are wealthy, although they are suffering from various ecological problems, yet, their governments ought to effort to mitigate environmental degradations. Secondly, tradition and cultural values could be vital for a country, so, preservative measures need to apply by authorities. Finally, the peaceful diplomatic relations with other countries is one profound mission of politicians that frequently guarantee the country's safety.

By way of conclusion, although I accept the importance of underlined benefits stemming from economic progress, further political and social areas have to boost through appropriate politics of the state.

Votes
Average: 4.4 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06367041199 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40131411432 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65543071161 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3430137058 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.538461538 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167569759236 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473817496662 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485954874783 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994116181892 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243555484106 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.31 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.