Many governments think that economic progress is their most important Goal. Some people however Think that other types of progress are Equally important for a country.
Discussed both these views and give your own opinion.
In this competitive and fast changing world, Many governments believe that economic prosperity has a significant role to play in citizens well-being, While others argue that there are many dimensions which are beneficial for societies success. In my view, a prosperous economy is crucial and can have straightforward impacts on other aspects of society.Why nowadays governments encourage their industries both private and public sectors should be more active? In this essay I will outline progress factors.
Recent statistic Studies have shown that some people would argue that governments have diverted the funding on industry and economy economy to come and makes Studies have shown that some people would argue that governments have diverted the funding on industry and economy, while play down other factors which have the same value and long lasting effect, consequently will guarantee the life of next generations.By the way of an example, as a world biggest industrial country, Its politicians just worry about producing and exporting their products all around the world and more importantly creating new job opportunities. Although it can rise citizens satisfaction for the time being, they don’t attention to our environment and global warming as a most remarkable controversial issue because our planet and species are on the verge of damaging and extinction.
On the other side of spectrum,many economists would argue that economic progressions are fundamental part of different countries, empowered them to pay more attention to other vital aspects of human being entails.If a country has successful economy which absorb finance perpetually, it will invest more money on the environmental issues and other aspects bringing about painstaking well being.For instance, developed countries with higher level of welfares such as Sweden spends more money on environmental researches and endangered species, while under developed countries not only have they poor economic climate and higher range of employment, but also generate great deal of harmful waste which are left in landfills and destroy natural habitats.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, prosperous economy should be a priority so as to upgrade infrastructures, together with taking account vital criterion in order to being more green, since some environmental damages are irreversible making environmentalists increasingly concerned due to uncontrolled factories emissions and so forth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Why
...ard impacts on other aspects of society.Why nowadays governments encourage their in...
^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: economy
...ve diverted the funding on industry and economy economy to come and makes Studies have shown th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
... guarantee the life of next generations.By the way of an example, as a world bigge...
^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , many
...nction. On the other side of spectrum,many economists would argue that economic pr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...er vital aspects of human being entails.If a country has successful economy which ...
^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...s bringing about painstaking well being.For instance, developed countries with high...
^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...prosperous economy should be a priority so as to upgrade infrastructures, together with ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, well, while, as to, for instance, such as, by the way, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68983957219 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1000226467 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601604278075 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 20.2975951904 261% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 229.3803543 49.4020404114 464% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 304.0 106.682146367 285% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.4285714286 20.7667163134 257% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166973824095 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744505018618 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345194517 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944722155025 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532252697977 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.1 13.0946893788 245% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 0.76 50.2224549098 2% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.44779559118 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 26.3 11.3001002004 233% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.61 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.25 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.1190380762 229% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.