In the modern era, with a sedentary lifestyle and unhealthy food choices, obesity and other health problems have become more ubiquitous among a bulk of citizens regardless of their genders or age groups. Therefore, some people assert that the government should put more taxes or higher price ranges for sweet food and beverages. In this essay, I would show my approval of this idea by giving reasonable evidence.
To commence with, sugary products have detrimental bearing on the consumers’ health. Scientists have proved that the more sugar we eat, the more calories our bodies have. The excessive calories which can not be released throughout the day will be ended by generating fat for later energy storage. As a matter of fact, fat in the long-term makes people gain weight or even negatively affect the human bloodstream which further leads to severe illnesses such as heart attack. Such scenarios could result in an unhealthy population which bring insurmountable consequences in the nation’ labourforce and social welfare. This, thus, should be avoided by discouraging people to buy those sugary foods and drinks in order to maintain human quality of life.
On the other hand, many people might argue that these actions could have adverse impacts on the companies where high levels of sugar products are produced, and somehow lead to unemployment issues. Admittedly, when putting higher prices for these products, the profit of the companies is potentially damaged which thrives their needs on staff reduction. However, I suggest that these companies could investigate more on local juices or artificial sugary goods. For instance, both multinational companies like Cocacola or Pepsi have already introduced health soft drinks to the public and received optimistic attitudes. In fact, it is likely to have a two-pronged benefit for both customers and the local farmers since their market became wider
In conclusion, I am of strong belief that it is suitable to take measures to address the health problems that sweet stuff can bring to human wellbeing. Moreover, companies should make alterations in order to catch up with the current trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29360465116 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70819014751 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7406231792 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.4 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229482231779 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702392919847 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551056330653 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118521602053 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533666928051 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.