The chart compares different proportions of nutrients, which would be harmful when over consuming, contained in 4 particular daily meals of Americans.
Overall, dinner consisted of the highest rate of sodium and saturated fat, whereas sugar was added mostly in snacks. It is also apparent that breakfast could be healthier than the others since it comprised the smallest percentage of these three nutrients.
Regarding breakfast, it contained a relatively low level of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar, hovering around 14-16% of the total. The proportion of sodium eaten in snacks was equal to that of breakfast at 14%, which was 5% less than the consumption of saturated fat in the same meal. However, these two figures of snacks combined are still much smaller than its proportion of sugar at 42%, holding the highest place in that pie.
In terms of dinner, while sodium and saturated fat accounted for the highest place in their own pies at 43% and 37% respectively, the percentage of added sugar accounted for nearly a quarter of the total. The consumption of sodium and saturated fat in lunch was almost equal at 29% for the former and 26% for the latter, which was greater than 19% of sugar.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99014778325 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63960358728 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6696007571 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0891771330847 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456747546892 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392894457698 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645137224122 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291141937268 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.