Many museum charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums are great place to learn about our historical past and visiting them has always been an exciting activity for people. Generally speaking, while some museums have entrance fees some are completely free to explore. On this note, it has always been a point of debate among people whether there should be any ticket price for museums or not. This essay will look at the advantages and disadvantage of the charging money from visitor to museums.
To begin with, museums can generate income for the government, not to mention put an ease on it expenses. Elaborating this, thousands of people visit museums every day and by charging some ticket fees to the museum government can add millions to the national account each day. For example, consider Taxila museum in Taxila, Pakistan; according to one survey about 40000 people visit it every day and if government charge a nominal fee of 100 rupees from each person then it can earn 4 million rupees. This money can then be spend on improving city infrastructure and building more tourist attractions which in turn will bring more tourist to the city and improve its economic conditions.
However on the negative side, charging huge fees can have some negative consequences. While it will increase revenue for the government it can indirectly effect the business of local people. Talking about this, asking for entrance fees from visitor will not only discourage people to visit museums but those that will visit will then spend less on local shops. Consequently, this will cause a decline in the earning opportunities of the locals shop since these visitor make up most of the customers of these shop. For example, when the government of Karachi, Pakistan started charging entrance fees for frere hall art gallery, the shops located around the gallery witnessed a drop of 44% in its sales according to one economic survey by university students.
To summarize, I believe that if government charge nominal fees from visitors that does not avert people from visiting museum then the advantages of having entrance fees to the museum outweigh its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 456, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this visitor' or 'these visitors'?
Suggestion: this visitor; these visitors
... opportunities of the locals shop since these visitor make up most of the customers of these ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, look, so, then, while, for example, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09455587393 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58804137232 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532951289398 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8149637383 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267573948778 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104750958524 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528678616413 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190775060765 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374506273367 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.