Statistics represent that tourists are more eager to visit historical sites and museums rather than people of these areas. While numerous reasons exist for this trend, they would be resolved by applying appropriate measures.
Several factors affect travelers' higher interest toward historical places of a region compared to that of local residents. First of all, as the authorities mainly target tourists for their marketing acts, they barely consider local dwellers' awareness to be a matter of concern. Therefore, the locals would prefer to spend their time paying a visit to other attractions outside their vicinity. Furthermore, since travelers are the main source of income for such places, the decision-makers may not bother to prioritize the affordability of visits for the local population. In contrast, they are not usually able to pay for these costs.
Despite the abovementioned factors, the issue would be tackled by performing suitable actions. The first and foremost is to raise awareness among local people about their precious history. Bearing in mind that the locals are more likely to contribute to the improvement of their own historical image, putting such practices into action would not only benefit the individuals but also enhancing the area’s status in the long term. In addition, although allocating subsidies to local residents is seemingly an unnecessary expenditure, this is nothing more than a misconception. Thus, the more they invest in attracting locals, the better their payback will become due to higher rates of visits.
In conclusion, besides the various factors influencing local people's lower interest to visit their own historical monuments, in contrast with tourists, their interest would be triggered by raising awareness and devoting funds by authorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dwellers'' or 'dweller's'?
Suggestion: dwellers'; dweller's
...rketing acts they barely consider local dwellers awareness to be a matter of concern The...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
... the individuals but also enhancing the areas status in the long term In addition alt...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44202898551 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76346448862 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 276.0 20.2975951904 1360% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1502.0 106.682146367 1408% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 276.0 20.7667163134 1329% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 132.0 7.06120827912 1869% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362987886104 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.362987886104 0.084324248473 430% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228935997364 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320422862794 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 142.2 13.0946893788 1086% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -217.12 50.2224549098 -432% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 112.1 11.3001002004 992% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.75 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.25 8.58950901804 259% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 112.4 10.1190380762 1111% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 10.7795591182 520% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.