Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
It is common knowledge that there are museums where a certain amount of money is required for admission to get their services, while others can offer visitors cost-free visits. In my viewpoint, charging museum visitors for entry can yield more benefits than drawbacks.
One of the apparent advantages of having visitors charged for admission is that the money would be diverted into museum maintenance and renovation. Objectively speaking, the management panel of a museum needs to have a budget to pay for its expenses, including operating costs like wages for the staff or renovating ones like infrastructure upgrades, especially for older museums. Also, exhibits such as paintings or artefacts need to be conserved and restored, which demands a large amount of money. Even though museums are a public service, they cannot solely count on the financial supply from city authorities. Therefore, admission fees are essential as an additional source for their budget to operate swimmingly.
Another benefit of admission fees is that they will be used for museum innovation. Only some museums have been built in the last few years when technological advances are starting to be applied in public services. Take Louvre Museum, built in 1793, as an example. If technology were not used in its infrastructure to provide its visitors with virtual reality, it might not be able to maintain its level of attraction. Therefore, to meet that demand, there should be an amount of money for which admission fees can be a source.
Opponents of museum entrance fees claim that charging people for admission can discourage visitors. Since not everyone can afford museum tickets, it may prevent people from being entertained and educated. Nevertheless, I believe admission fees are worth the visitors' experience since they can ensure the high quality of the visit, which aims to retain more attention.
In conclusion, I assume getting people charged for admission before their experience in a museum can be advantageous rather than disadvantageous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... like wages for the staff or renovating ones like infrastructure upgrades, especiall...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30650154799 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89515567904 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572755417957 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7974561875 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37524608844 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143884623613 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107186925877 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251192328095 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600499266242 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.