There are enormous number of museum throughout the world ask visitors entry fee while others are free. People argued the issue and some believe charging people for admission would contribute to privileges to museum. Of course, without possession of economic resources maintenance of museum and especially historical places is not possible.
Nowadays, nations are challenging with loss of their historical remnant and precious master pieces because of lack of means and instruments that would help them keep museum pieces from harm. As a result, having an earn would be a feasible way for provision of museum security devices and infrastructures. For example, there are large numbers of museum-parks in Tehran that are home for hundreds of ancient statute, although they are disappearing every year. Since, there is not adequate security guard and sophisticated devices that could guarantee the safety of them.
On the other hand, the history and originality of nations are keeping in museum and illustration of tribes and all the ethnic group's tradition and custom is expressed by museum. Hence, people themselves should perceive the fact that by paying admission fee they indirectly help themselves authenticity to be stay for good. As a matter of the fact, some people have denounced museum with the torrent of angry worlds for entrance fee prices regardless appreciation of about its upsides toward museum. Indeed, it would be wise if people do either some voluntary work or send donation to museum instead of resenting charging for entry fees.
In my point of view, museum should be backed strongly by people since next generation would have more transparent conscious regarding their former ancestors and culture. Trifle admission payment would not only lead to preserving of human beings history and identity, but could also be a policy of keeping traditions alive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... course, without possession of economic resources maintenance of museum and especially hi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly historical places is not possible. Nowadays, nations are challenging with l...
^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...m pieces from harm. As a result, having an earn would be a feasible way for provision o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...lustration of tribes and all the ethnic groups tradition and custom is expressed by mu...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ld not only lead to preserving of human beings history and identity, but could also be...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, so, then, while, for example, of course, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73985127734 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1401816356 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.846153846 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282698289886 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105618519077 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714563249567 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178248451022 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831616129171 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.