many museums charge for admission while others are free.
do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
We all might have visited several museums in different places, and we might have wondered why some of them are free while some need a purchased ticket for entry. Comparing the benefits and drawbacks of each of these policies, I believe that the benefits are way more as I will explain in this essay.
Paying a sum of money to enjoy visiting a museum can help the responsible people and the staff of the museum to maintain the place and keep it for next generations. For instance, antiques, historical items and buildings are considerably valuable so their maintanance consists of great importance. Moreover, only if museums have enough money will more facilities, such as translation services, be provided for visitors. In this way, people will have a better experience visiting a museum while learning more about the history behind the things they see. To be more precise, only watching some fascinating items is not the sole purpose of a museum; therefore, charging people is required so that the quality of a visit is enhanced.
Although there are several advantages to charging for admission, there is one disadvantage that I can think of. Museums’ entrance being free for the public attracts more people to visit it, hence, a larger proportion of people will gain knowledge about history, which is considered to be a desirable achievement. The more the museums charge visitors, the less they tend to go and visit.
To sum up, it appears to me that collecting money by selling tickets to people can bring more advantages than disadvantages. However, it is up to the museum keepers to decide whether they need the money or not, since some museums are funded by the governments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... believe that the benefits are way more as I will explain in this essay. Paying...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97535211268 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79552407789 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4579856635 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295313154764 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117151367677 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638662560979 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181900784924 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844278262705 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.