Museums have a large collection of art, historic and science objects, which they provide for educational purposes for the public. Nowadays visitors can enjoy free entrance to many museums worldwide. However, some other museums charge for admission tickets. I believe that charging people for admission has more benefits than drawbacks.
A noticeable disadvantage of fee-paying museums is the possibility of reducing the number of visitors. Actually, people would prefer not to pay, because there are many other museums that they can visit for free. Schools can not arrange educational tours to the local museums, as a result, students are discouraged to visit them and not able to access useful information and knowledge freely. From the museums’ perspective, they cannot attain one of their objectives to educate people. Moreover, they may have to close down as they lose more of their customers.
Despite the disadvantages, I think that charging for admission has a greater number of advantages. Firstly, the extra money from visitors is helping museums continue to operate. They can add new exhibits to their collection, make researches and restore damaged objects. Secondly, they can improve infrastructure, provide guide services for their visitors, keep the place clean and even improve the security measures. People can see that many museums which sell tickets are better and more interesting than those that do not charge for admission.
In conclusion, although I recognize that museums ticket sales can have drawbacks, I believe that museums should remain free and need to operate and improve their services.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ose that do not charge for admission. In conclusion, although I recognize that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79860671522 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579365079365 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5115004846 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328347057197 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130408691755 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103419858111 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213500407521 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110942460975 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.