Sometimes, in educational purposes, parents and teachers use different punishments. There is no doubt that to much freedom can often spoil children, while too much punishment can make children less confident and creative. Therefore, I personally believe that punishment has negative effects on the efficiency of the educational process.
Punishment is the most common method of maintaining the discipline of children in schools and at home. However, it has no connection to human values, because children are very sensitive and touchy by nature. Some children become more capricious, naughty through punishment, moreover, some of them may imitate course manners towards others. In addition, fear of punishment makes foster such characteristics as dishonesty and deceitfulness. For example, children may deny their action or work, for fear of sanctions from adults, continuing to tell a lie and understanding that it is the best way to avoid punishments.
Therefore, instead of saviour punishment parents and teachers should always think about the alternative and rational methods of punishments. Every time when children fail to do their homework or assignments, teachers may ask students to sit after schools hours until complete their work. When some household stuff or goods are destroyed by children parents need to ask them to clean it up or repair parents and teachers should be aware that the main purpose of punishment is to teach something rather than to humiliate and hurt him morally and physically.
To conclude, I believe that physical punishment can hardly be effective to introduce children with good manners.
Hence, emphasis should be referred to constructive and practical punishment to show them correct direction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31460674157 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85654622916 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602996254682 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0268568872 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4705882353 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170485779819 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518283531604 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039533495634 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943506766546 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289851762635 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.