Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
While some museums are free, there are many if them having entrance fees. I personally think having to pay to see art in every kind, is necessary and my reasons for this comes as follows.
First of all, I think the main reason behind admission changes is that a museum has a wide range of expenditure; from staff’s paychecks to everyday cleansing and etc. But unfortunately, not all of these costs are provided by governments. Therefore, entrance money is mostly about supplying museum’s costs. Second of all, art conservation is an intense and expensive issue. Museums need to have a high budget for emergency restorations to make sure art pieces are safe and stored in an excellent terms in order to remain for the next generations. Art pieces with hundreds years archaism are even more fragile and in danger, so they require constant care and observation. At the end, all these activities come at huge costs yearly.
On the other hand, some might say that art should be for everyone and since these charges are often expensive, not everybody can afford them. I think they are right and museums should not be the organ that build a huge gap between high-income families and low-income ones. However, there is a majority of different kind of discounts. For instance, students have all year long discount; they should only provide their IDs and they are set. Some museums are free on special occasions and holidays and it’s a great opportunity for people who are low on cash to be able to visit their favorite museums.
By way of conclusion, I think the advantages of admission charges do outweigh the disadvantages. Tickets are necessary and as art is for everybody, I believe that we should pay fees with an open heart. Also, I recommend voluntary donations and silent auctions for wealthy people in exchange for high quality copies of some art pieces.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...'s paychecks to everyday cleansing and etc. But unfortunately, not all of these cos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'term'?
Suggestion: term
...ces are safe and stored in an excellent terms in order to remain for the next generat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91509433962 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74246471141 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7284964764 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9411764706 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323982926925 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912876558419 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901352728348 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194329399429 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526874897884 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.