Many old buildings protected by law are part of nation’s history.
Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
Should history stand in the way of progress?
A plethora of historical buildings as a part of countries’ history is protected by some regulations of law. While certain people argue that these buildings ought to make way for contemporary buildings, I definitely believe that the maintenance of old buildings is crucially important and should not to stop the progress of countries.
Preserving historical buildings is meaningful for several reasons. The foremost reason is that antique constructions are the heritage of our culture, traditions and customs showing us how our ancestors used to live in the previous years. In the same way, historical buildings have reflected ancestors’ legacy from the past, as well as the diversity of architectural styles, such as classicism, renaissance or even baroque. For example, the key architectural style of Lithuanian capital is classicism that allows us to recognise when the main buildings were erected, namely city hall and cathedral. In addition to this, ancestors’ legacy assists to learn more about our history and as a consequence either to inspire patriotism or proud of their nation.
On the other hand, many people argue that these old buildings are obstacles in the progress of countries and new ones being more suitable in our day-to-day lives should replace them. However, old buildings as a heritage of nation enhance tourism in countries that have brought about the ability to increase income of budget. Moreover, a tremendous attraction of tourists to historical buildings has prompted many investments to establish companies in touristic countries result in decreasing the unemployment rate in these nations.
In conclusion, despite the argument that some argue that these historic buildings have to be destroyed making way for new constructions, I firmly believe that the protection of old buildings is beneficial for countries and might not stop the development of nations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50340136054 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1810923312 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554421768707 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3244420048 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.090909091 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329607010299 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124071363 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084495501283 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216805640739 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884004470512 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.