In many parts of the world, people do research on their family history. Some people believe that finding out about previous generations is a useful thing to do. However, others believe that it is better to focus on present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, people conduct family history research all throughout the world. While some individuals do believe that it's beneficial to learn about prior generations, others contend that concentrating on the present and future generations is preferable and pragmatic. From my perspective, people should strive for a balance between embracing the past and actively shaping the future.
On the one hand, it is evident that finding out about one’s roots is an opportunity for everyone to discover ancestral traditions, customs, and values. By respecting and detecting the family’s legacy, we can develop not only a sense of belonging but also will appreciate the present and future. Moreover, this can allow the preservation of valuable and noteworthy knowledge, stories, and traditions. For instance, on September 2nd every year, people in numerous areas, especially in Quang Binh province, always organize a festival called the Dragon boat festival in order to show the spirit of preserving Vietnamese traditions and enriching and enlightening experiences for individuals.
On the other hand, dwelling on the past excessively will lead to the stagnation that society may be reluctant to change and innovate. Instead of being overly preoccupied about prior ancestors, individuals should spend time shaping and obtaining better lives. Additionally, dedicating concentration to the present helps us address immediate challenges without any fears and contribute positively to ourselves and our society.
In conclusion, I think that both views are reasonable as well as each has its own merits so that people should keep balance by concentrating on the present and future generations to achieve a meaningful world, albeit remembering to appreciate and draw wisdom from their ancestors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... I think that both views are reasonable as well as each has its own merits so that people ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65298507463 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07883307057 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667910447761 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6449936701 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.727272727 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256287426284 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810253290945 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825948568154 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14727595677 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105732561514 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.