Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
There is no doubt that people nowadays tend to travel overseas to broaden their horizons. However, global tourism has negative impacts on the countries that tourists come from. This essay will outline several reasons for this trend and propose potential solutions to address the issue.
On one hand, various factors contribute to the adverse effects of tourism in other countries. Firstly, environmental impact is a significant concern. The more tourists there are, the greater the pollution they generate. Tourists often rely on transportation to reach popular destinations or explore new places, leading to increased air pollution due to traffic congestion. Additionally, some travelers abroad irresponsibly dispose of waste during their journeys, tarnishing the host country's image. Moreover, international tourism can facilitate the spread of diseases across borders. For example, the rapid and easily transmissible COVID-19 virus highlighted the potential for infected individuals to unknowingly transmit diseases to other countries.
On the other hand, several viable solutions can help mitigate these problems. Firstly, governments should take proactive measures to address these issues, such as using banners or billboards on streets to raise awareness among both local residents and tourists. Furthermore, implementing strict regulations and penalties for littering can help maintain a cleaner environment. Placing numerous trash bins in every corner of the area would encourage proper waste disposal. Moreover, authorities must enhance control measures for foreign entries. This could involve employing advanced scanning equipment to ensure the safety of incoming travelers.
In conclusion, while global tourism presents challenges, there are viable measures that can be taken to alleviate the negative impacts. By addressing the root causes and implementing the suggested solutions, countries can strike a balance between enjoying the benefits of tourism and mitigating its adverse effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03846153846 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92503573074 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678321678322 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5491858504 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9444444444 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182164367322 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479720754845 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042018913297 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111836637671 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606164897258 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.