Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
The notion that foreign tourism exerts negative effects on nations is held by a portion of the population. This essay will elucidate several factors contributing to this sentiment and propose a variety of potential solutions to address the issue.
On one hand, there exist several reasons for which travelers face criticism due to their perceived impact on the environment. Firstly, many tourists exhibit a lack of awareness concerning environmental preservation, leading to the indiscriminate disposal of various forms of trash and plastic waste in their surroundings. This irresponsible behavior results in environmental pollution and a surge in litter accumulation. Furthermore, the use of vehicles by tourists contributes to air pollution, as increased vehicular activity releases higher levels of emissions into the atmosphere. Lastly, the movement of tourists across borders has the potential to introduce infectious diseases, including viruses and pandemics, adversely affecting both local residents and fellow travelers. For instance, the global spread of the infectious COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 led to a significant loss of lives due to the movement of infected individuals.
Conversely, several pragmatic solutions can be employed to address this multifaceted issue. Primarily, governments should enact policies to limit the generation of waste by foreign visitors. This could entail implementing awareness campaigns, including the display of banners, aimed at educating individuals about the imperative of safeguarding the environment. Moreover, tourists themselves should be encouraged to adopt responsible travel practices, including the proper disposal of waste generated during their visits. Additionally, authorities should invest in state-of-the-art equipment to conduct thorough health screenings of travelers at airports, thus mitigating the risk of disease transmission.
In conclusion, while there are undeniable challenges associated with international tourism, there are also viable remedies to mitigate these issues. From my perspective, these measures not only benefit the local populace but also contribute to the overall well-being of the nation and its governance. Through concerted efforts and the adoption of responsible tourism practices, the negative impact of foreign tourism can be curtailed, fostering a harmonious coexistence between visitors and host communities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13313609467 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29504653625 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636094674556 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8999804143 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5625 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118269569438 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343526993385 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366473621837 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673182682384 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236105837147 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.55 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 78.4519038076 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.