MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THE NUCLEAR POWER IS DANGEROUS FOR THE WORLD AND IT SHOULD BE ABANDONED. THE OTHER STICK TO THE POINT THAT THIS TYPE OF ENERGY IS MOST USEFUL AND PRODUCTIVITY.
Day by day, people are losing concern about environmental safety is an indeed. Now a day, some people believe that nuclear power has chance to damage or dangerous for the world and it must prohibited. On the other side some people arguing that it help for productivity. Personally I believe that nuclear energy is not safe for people and world. Nuclear accidents lead to the distraction of mankind and while using nuclear energy people must face a lot of health problem.
Unfortunately there are a lot of tragedy deaths in our history based on the process of creating and utilizing nuclear energy. We all know, while producing electricity through nuclear energy emits which is very harmful to mankind. Radio active waste must processes carefully and buried with the mix of concrete waste. It is a time taken process with includes of risk. Radiation waves may have chance to spared in environment can impose into dangerous situations and results health problems like lunge disease to people. Finely in any case of accident occurs on nuclear reactors leads to distraction of lacks of hectors and even the soil will lose fertility for decades. We had experienced Bhopal nuclear accident as witness.
In the case of productivity of electricity, compared with hydro process nuclear process can generate low amount of power there is no scope for productivity while using nuclear process.
With these avoidance I conclude that utility of nuclear energy is not essential for people and as per population’s argument nuclear plants must demolish in the society, leads to a safe side of mankind there are a lot of other ways for the production of electricity
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucing electricity through nuclear energy emits which is very harmful to mankind. ...
^^
Line 4, column 6, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this avoidance' or 'these avoidances'?
Suggestion: this avoidance; these avoidances
...vity while using nuclear process. With these avoidance I conclude that utility of nuclear ener...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r ways for the production of electricity
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, while, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05109489051 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75778169948 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9529433401 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.92857142857 7.06120827912 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275215888891 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106080121883 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988199271792 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176423905205 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104123861261 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.