In most contemporary countries, social networking is most prevalent media across all individual right from small children to elderly people. As there are more focus on news around the world, people are always inclined to social networking sites almost throughout the day or night. I certainly disagree the fact that is beneficial to individual in their personality development or career development front.
Firstly, most of network sites, gather information as cookies, in which people knowingly or unknowingly provide information and its sold to marketing people. Also, major information is taken from Facebook and is used for public services like election, to identify which party people are interested to vote or nominate. Hence, they are not at all beneficial and have negative effect on society.
In addition, children are addicted to major websites which may cause in deterioration in their education and diverting their attention towards unauthorised or unnecessary websites. However, children’s communication with parents or relatives are much reduced as they are always inclined to their mobile or computers. Moreover, children become more aggressive if their attention is diverted or given extra homework or parents requesting them to help in their domestic work. Thus, this leads to juvenile delinquent behaviour in children. Hence, there are more probability of enabling them as abused adults involved in negative social behaviour.
Finally, Adults spend most of their quality time in chatting and posting in social sites, instead of playing or spending evenings/weekend with their children or family. Eventually, this leads to health hazards namely eye loss, hearing loss and attention deficit behaviour
In conclusion, I totally refute the claim that social networking is beneficial. It does not provide any healthy practice albeit collects private information and sends to third party. Also, most affected individuals are children by the way they are exposed to incorrect websites for access. Additionally, adults have major detrimental effects because of their regular addiction to websites.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, third, thus, in addition, in conclusion, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67823343849 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96021444625 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583596214511 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3108959813 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113985282153 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401509609644 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398997927103 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682340357754 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448478663659 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.