Many people believe that social networking sites(such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.
To what extent do you agree?
These days many people think that social networking applications sites (such us Facebook and other applications) have had an enormous negative influence on both individuals and general public.
From my point of view, I completely agree with this statement, followed up with a logical conclusion.
Certainly, using social networking applications has its benefits. It could help people maintain a close relationship with each other at a budgetary. At one time, people have to use phones or write a letter to stay in contact with their friends which could be very time-consuming. However, by using social networking applications such as Telegram, WhatsApp, IMO, Instagram or Facebook people can send texts momently and get immediate answers.
In spite of that, the disadvantages of using social networking applications are far worse than we think.
The first argument, the majority of the contents or games on the social networking applications is very exciting to youngsters. The second argument, people are so addicted to social networking applications that they are more likely to impair the feeling of their loved ones. With an excessive amount of time spending on electron devices after work or school, people spend less time on more meaningful conversation with their families. The final argument is in society level, criminals could also use social networking applications to behave illegal activities. Criminals can use networking sites to organize crimes without being detected by authorities.
In conclusion, it appears that it is crucial to limit the time people spend on the social networking applications in our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ative influence on both individuals and general public. From my point of view, I completel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...a close relationship with each other at a budgetary. At one time, people have to use phones...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49802371542 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03314296665 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.630255468 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245567619659 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942093573215 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806718069416 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136370282821 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102165296037 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.