In this day and age, behavior between inhabitants is has been an issue that draws a lot of attention from the public. It is said that there is rapid rise in anti social behavior and disrespect for others. There are a host of reasons behind this phenomenon, and it should be dealt with by several viable solutions.
To commence with, due to the gradual development of nations, more and more people are becoming unemployed, this leads to many social's problem such as vices, class detinction and so forth. To be more specific, if a graduated student faces unemployment and poverty, they will easily feel dissapointed and therefore they have many wrongdoings. In addition, the impact of the media and the internet on everyone makes everything worse. To be precise, in TV programs, there are some violent and sexual scenes, which attract many youngsters. As a result, many youngsters are having a sedentary lifestyle as they just need a computer to be satisfied, they do not want to communicate with anyone else. Last but not least, as the social media is uncontrolled developing, many toxic trends appeared. For instance, there are some trends which encourage users to do certain things when they can get a certain amount of likes.
I believe that there are still some ways to solve this situation. First, schools need to give some reality lessons in which students know what to do even when they can not get their aspired and desired job, this will help them a lot in the future. Second, government should bring out suitable laws and regulations. For example, authorities should control the content of social media to prevent users from using it in a wrong way. Third, schools need to cooperate with parents to take good care of children. In other words, they need to manage children' time, encourage them to develop themselves, teach them to use social media in a right way.
In conclusion, the ill-behave actions can be ascribed to 3 aforementioned factors, and these actions can be dealt with by a joint endavor of both governments and individuals.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... and disrespect for others. There are a host of reasons behind this phenomenon, and...
^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disrespect for others. There are a host of reasons behind this phenomenon, and i...
^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'socials'' or 'social's'?
Suggestion: socials'; social's
...becoming unemployed, this leads to many socials problem such as vices, class detinction...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...al media to prevent users from using it in a wrong way. Third, schools need to cooperate with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...mselves, teach them to use social media in a right way. In conclusion, the ill-behave actions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88252148997 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70313430718 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575931232092 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2098557912 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.235294118 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144274568473 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456369190072 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359139373013 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750840279204 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442346303833 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... and disrespect for others. There are a host of reasons behind this phenomenon, and...
^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disrespect for others. There are a host of reasons behind this phenomenon, and i...
^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'socials'' or 'social's'?
Suggestion: socials'; social's
...becoming unemployed, this leads to many socials problem such as vices, class detinction...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...al media to prevent users from using it in a wrong way. Third, schools need to cooperate with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...mselves, teach them to use social media in a right way. In conclusion, the ill-behave actions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88252148997 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70313430718 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575931232092 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2098557912 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.235294118 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144274568473 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456369190072 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359139373013 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750840279204 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442346303833 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.