Many people believed the increasing fuel cost may reduce the traffic congestion and air pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree>
The sheer number of private cars on the street is thought to be responsible for traffic jam and the emission from these cars are causing air pollution. Many people believed that increasing the gasoline price will deter the general public from buying the personal car and thereby it will reduce the traffic congestion and decrease the greenhouse gas production. In my opinion, the city dwellers will continue to drive their own cars unless the government provide a comfortable and affordable public transport system for them. Government and policymaker have to put their thought collectively in developing a sustainable urban transport system which can carry a large number of passengers effectively. Furthermore, the city council have to focus on promoting the use of the bicycle to commute to and from the workplace.
Rising car ownership is related to economic growth and the accelerated rate of globalization. Most of the people in major cities around the world depend on the private car to travel because of comfort and security, despite the high fuel cost. The rural areas and outskirts of the city have a limited number of bus and train service or no service at all. The public transport system are not friendly to Individual with restricted mobility. There are no washroom and entertainment facilities on the train. These are the potential draw back that inhibit the general public to use mass transit.
On the other hand, the existing road condition is not safe for cycling as there is no designated lane on the highway and on the streets at community level for bicycling. Cycling is environmentally friendly and good for physical and mental health. Cycling is a good physical exercise that keep the vital parameter of health within the normal limit and does not cause any emission.
Therefore, the number of cars is on the rise. Apart from congestion and pollution, it is also linked to increase number of road traffic accidents. Increasing the gasoline price would increase the transportation cost, leading to rise of commodities price.Government need a comprehensive plan with a aim to develop affordable, sustainable, and environmental friendly urban transport system. In my opinion, expansion Bus Rapid Transit, Subway and Light-rail would be the best option for mass people transit effectively and timely manner. These modes of transport are economically viable and environmentally sustainable and operate for longer period, so cost effective. Bicycle friendly roads development would
reduce the number of cars on the street. City should opt transit-oriented real estate development that would further decrease congestion. Decentralization of adminstrative facilities, court, health care and recreation facilities to rural areas will reduce the number of vehicles on the highway.
In conclusion, the use of private vehicle will continue to rise despite traffic clog road and pollution. The effect of rising fuel cost will have a transient effect on the reduction of number of cars on the roads, while accessible and affordable urban transport system and provision of safe cycling track on the street can alleviate the congestion and pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...asing the gasoline price will deter the general public from buying the personal car and thereb...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 660, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... urban transport system which can carry a large number of passengers effectively. Furthermore, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...he potential draw back that inhibit the general public to use mass transit. On the other h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Government
...t, leading to rise of commodities price.Government need a comprehensive plan with a aim to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'needs'.
Suggestion: needs
...to rise of commodities price.Government need a comprehensive plan with a aim to deve...
^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...vernment need a comprehensive plan with a aim to develop affordable, sustainable,...
^
Line 7, column 684, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...od, so cost effective. Bicycle friendly roads development would reduce the number o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 707, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Bicycle friendly roads development would reduce the number of cars on the street....
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 1615.20841683 165% => OK
No of words: 501.0 315.596192385 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33532934132 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01568734154 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481037924152 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 837.0 506.74238477 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.508729433 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136704934233 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373071687451 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536961089027 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703671905241 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448586228101 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.