Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered species for example the tiger or the blue whale To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered species, for example the tiger or the blue whale.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Today there are several species facing the threat of extinction due to a variety of reasons such as illegal hunting or climate change. Nevertheless, it is believed that protection of species in danger is waste of budget. As far as I am concerned, I completely disagree with this opinion.
In the terms of biologics, all species play a vital role in balance of nature. In other words, the loss of a particular species affects detrimentally to environment, even to human beings. For example, some studies show that the whale can absorb a large amount of carbon dioxide, a kind of gas not supporting for survival, which regulates the atmosphere on earth. Furthermore, in case one species disappears, others in food chain may lose their source of food. Therefore, the extinction of one species probably drives other ones to the edge of disappearance.
Another reason for the need of endangered species conservation is that it is a matter of humanitarian. Like human beings, other species desire to maintain their survival. Thus, the action of illegal hunting must be prohibited in order to retain species, especially those which are difficult to reintroduce. In addition, all species on earth support each other including human so protecting them is also an activity to save human life.
In conclusion, it is encouraged to grant for conservation of endangered species programs due to the integral roles of them in ecosystem as well as benefits of human in a long way. Not only biodiversity is put in balance but also negative effects do not happen on human.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-07 tsln7607 67 view
2023-03-02 klinh.. 78 view
2023-01-02 n.rajabi 67 view
2022-09-09 sunflower.cow 67 view
Essays by user sunflower.cow :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a long way" with adverb for "long"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... ecosystem as well as benefits of human in a long way. Not only biodiversity is put in balanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99615384615 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96173575766 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.490534046 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156287114053 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547389057138 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359709215889 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957626826584 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191515309019 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.