Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why
could this be?
Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Nowadays, more and more people love to watch exotic movies rather than domestically produced films. There are several reasons behind this tendency, and I think governments should help local film-makers by giving more financial support to them.
It is clear that there could be some causes which make foreign films attract more people. Firstly, these movies are invested with the amount of money by many sponsors around the world. Because of having enormous budgets, oversea films are always made with tremendous information and computerize technology effects which have a huge charisma with audiences by famous directors. Secondly, the excellent contents, which based on the best novels, are produced by an experimented producer that will attract lots of people. For example, “Harry Potter” is always the must-watch foreign film of all the time.
I suppose that governments should help local film industries to confront with exotic films by investing in finance for them. Therefore, the domestic producers can hire good actors and actresses if authorities subsidize for their budgets. Moreover, the directors can recruit several technical experts to make the eye-catching advertisement for a film to attract more audiences. Besides, because of the sponsor of the governments, film-makers can also introduce the discount tickets and promotion solutions to movie-lovers. For instance, the movie “Tam Cam” attracted many people with the supporting of local authorities, and it also was the best film that was produced only by the Vietnamese movie-makers.
In conclusion, I believe that financial subsidize from governments which not only support local movie industries but also strengthen their productivity to attract more audiences.
</span><div><br></div>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed only by the Vietnamese movie-makers. In conclusion, I believe that financial ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...productivity to attract more audiences.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, i suppose, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85714285714 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4248347267 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6554065572 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.846153846 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387877152602 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132865776312 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973712508308 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196820795747 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129769208423 0.056905535591 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.