Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally films. Why could this be?
Should government give more financial support to local industries?
Nowadays, people could not imagine their lives without a cinema. It is argued that in modern society, a lot of citizens desire to watch international films rather than domestic ones. The reason for this could be a lack of popular celebrities and not sufficient financial support from the state.
To begin with, well-known actors play an important role in the industry of video. It is certainly true that the best films always accompanied by stars like Brad Pitt and Angelina Joli because they are able to perform a great role-play. If the county does not have popular artists in its film industry, customers will not prefer to watch such movies. For example, TOP 100 of rated films has at least 3 well-known celebrities in the shooting.
Each industry should have financial support from the government in order to be successful. This also applies to the filmography. Economic benefits will attract more video directors to produce more films because this will give them a high income. These advantages could be tax-free areas for the movies. For example, most of the United States TV shows were made in British Columbia, which is located in Canada because of its low tax.
Taking all these points into consideration, to make a domestic video popular, the government should help the video producers with money, moreover, the country should have a lot of well-known actors in the cinema industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cient financial support from the state. To begin with, well-known actors play an...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...well-known celebrities in the shooting. Each industry should have financial supp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cated in Canada because of its low tax. Taking all these points into considerati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, well, as for, at least, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06008583691 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62113373528 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62660944206 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0811234588 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6923076923 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255646679265 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851866318289 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627828885338 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145411416189 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763551621202 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.