Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationship. Do you agree or disagree?
Today, consistently state-of-the-art advancements of modern technology make numerous modifications in aspect of communication. Some critics propose that the emergence of modern technology poses a severe threat to social relationship. As far as I am concerned, I partly agree with this statement due to irrefutable prospects that technology is enhancing our contacts.
On the one hand, virtual reality such as Facebook or Messenger, as well as technology device like smartphone constitute effective tools to keep contacts long-lasting. Thanks to globally widespread of the internet, no matter how long the distance is amongst territories, people still enable to stay connected to their sweethearts. Not only does it maintain concrete relationship, online platform also helps users enlarge their social circles around the world via applications for making friends. What is more? Unlike means of contact in the past that people had to wait for a long while in order to receive response, modern technology delivers plenty of messages promptly through internet or mobile connection.
On the other hand, the event of wrecking social etiquettes has a tendency to be more and more considerable than ever. For instance, linguistic violence which is a prevalent phenomenon in online environment elevates serious rivals without any respects amongst netizens, . Additionally, because of its convenience in communication, people tend to marginalise physical relation and consider electronic device as a substitution that kind of interaction. Indeed, from my perspective, there is no alternative type of conversation that is more effective and close-knit than face-to-face communication.
In conclusion, modern technology includes both benefits and downsides. Its advancements may result in either improving in interaction or jeopardising relationships. Absolutely, this depends on how each individual utilizes this potential tool.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-03 | tao_minh_anh | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-06 | sunflower.cow | 67 | view |
| 2017-04-12 | sandrock | 55 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar canes Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered species for example the tiger or the blue whale To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- People think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others believe that there are other alternative solutions for reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 89
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationship Do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly through internet or mobile connection On the other hand it is such a convenien...
^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... closeknit than facetoface communication In conclusion modern technology includes...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70676691729 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25799980396 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 266.0 20.2975951904 1311% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1518.0 106.682146367 1423% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 266.0 20.7667163134 1281% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 120.0 7.06120827912 1699% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232180483262 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232180483262 0.084324248473 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128040734097 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505279716523 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 138.5 13.0946893788 1058% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -215.43 50.2224549098 -429% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 109.4 11.3001002004 968% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 17.32 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.11 8.58950901804 257% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 64.0 9.78957915832 654% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 108.4 10.1190380762 1071% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 109.0 10.7795591182 1011% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly through internet or mobile connection On the other hand it is such a convenien...
^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... closeknit than facetoface communication In conclusion modern technology includes...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70676691729 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25799980396 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 266.0 20.2975951904 1311% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1518.0 106.682146367 1423% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 266.0 20.7667163134 1281% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 120.0 7.06120827912 1699% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232180483262 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232180483262 0.084324248473 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128040734097 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505279716523 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 138.5 13.0946893788 1058% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -215.43 50.2224549098 -429% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 109.4 11.3001002004 968% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 17.32 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.11 8.58950901804 257% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 64.0 9.78957915832 654% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 108.4 10.1190380762 1071% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 109.0 10.7795591182 1011% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.