It is true that, in this contemporary era, most of the parents are being established only nuclear family or they do not want to become parents. In addition, this thing is being considered good by many communities in developed countries. According to my perspective, it is not a positive trend.
To start with, people had more money in their old time so that is why they were able to take care of more children at a same time. However, it is not possible today. Firstly, young generation want to become a financially successfull as well as work is being done more according to their capacity by them and do not have sufficient time to spend with children. Furthermore, they do not want to become parents. Secondly, they introspect that only a child is also good because they could take care of their only a child very well or fulfill all the demands of children. Thirdly, many policies are being run by government that if you have one or two children so government would give you more benefits as compared to those people who have more than couple of child.
Looking at the other view, there are few demerits also available. Firstly, people are not doing more children so that is why elderly people ratio is much high as compared to young generation and it may cause directly or indirectly on countries' economy. Secondly, it might be reduce labour force in the future. For example, most of the people have no children and they are suffering in their old age because they have to do all work by themselves like, cooking, washing dishes etc.
On a concluding note, undoubtedly having no child or two it is beneficial if you want to do something great in your life yet, we must understand that children play a crucial role in economy and they are a future of our countries. Moreover, I personally introspect that it is a good trend and we cannot play with our country's.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... it may cause directly or indirectly on countries economy. Secondly, it might be reduce l...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, in addition, as well as, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63063063063 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62138942038 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510510510511 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4233397551 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7333333333 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264828318306 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840096491805 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444372150289 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156936390813 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306572843643 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.