Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past. Why is that so? Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages?
There is a growing recognization that many people's writing styles tend to be more informal and relaxing these days. The proliferation of technology and the radical change in ways of life may acts as the precrusors to the phenomenon, and the drawbacks from the shift in writing approaches may eclipse the benefits.
Given the use of state-of-the-art telecommunication devices, people's written language are heavily impacted. Individuals once took advantage of letter and post office system to communicate with other for long distance, which would take days even months. Due to this, senders tend to pay more attention to their handwriting styles. By comparison, smart equipment allow users to send messages in the blink of an eye. In the long run, the harness of technology makes people less aware of their writing styles. An additional reason why people advocate informal writing is the change in lifestyle. While modern citizens are burdened with more pressing tasks as a result of the faster pace of life, the role of formal writing seems insignificant. This makes people invest less time and energy in optimizing their writing. Thus, the shift in modern technology and perspective about writing can be attributable to the way people write.
On the one hand, informal ways of writing enable people to save time for other priorities. While the traditional approach to writing demands writers maximized attention and skills, with a less formal writing style, people nowadays can prioritize other things. This includes achieving their work life balance, rearing their children and upgrading their base of knowledge. On the other hand, as formal writing unveils many aspects of one's personalities, it is commonly utilized by many in order to evaluate others' characteristics. If a person's piece of writing appears as untidy and clumsy, they are likely to be deemed as unreliable themselves. This may imply negative implications on people's employability or takes its toll on their business opportunities. The new way of writing, therefore, brings more harm than good for people.
In sum, people's informal writing style are heavily impacted by the exploitation of new technological gadgets and the view to this means of communication. The merits of the degraded writing style are overshadowed by its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 433, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... formal writing unveils many aspects of ones personalities, it is commonly utilized ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vily impacted by the exploitation of new technological gadgets and the view to th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33879781421 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00514156238 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9818167053 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219937214918 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681532482256 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043969223091 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128938093616 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553454095994 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.