Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages

Essay topics:

Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.
Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?

In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that we are totally surrounded by technology and it's products. Some people concur that use of hand made items and it's production are continueslly slumped, because of mechanical advancement. However, I quibble from them and propound that machines are playing very crucial role in humans life and it's give occeans of benefits. In this essay, I will cite light on both the notions before a logical conclusion is reached.

Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of mechanical slaves. The top notch concrete reason is that machine makes our life more simple and comfortable, because we not have to do repetitive work. Another rational reason which hauls me to patron is that it's save lots of working time. So people can spend their quality time with family and friends. To uphold my notion, I like to quote an instance of mechanical equipment which use to do embroidery works, if this work is completed by hand then it take plenty of time, but machine complete these works in only few seconds or minutes. The rear most coherent fector which cannot be neglected is that machine reduce production cost and it also provide products in short time which are demanded by customes.

What is half for some, may apper half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that machine has some nasty results for society which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that due to invention of machine, it lead to unemployment. For example, a work is completed by 10 people, same work is completed by only 1 man with help of machine. They also uphold that machines are not give quality work like artisans, who are produce unique items.

All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting machine works. However, it's contrary can be overlooked. Concequently, I firmly disagree with the given statement.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: top-notch
...e the concept of mechanical slaves. The top notch concrete reason is that machine makes o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... instance of mechanical equipment which use to do embroidery works, if this work is...
^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
... this work is completed by hand then it take plenty of time, but machine complete th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...hine reduce production cost and it also provide products in short time which are demand...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...em that due to invention of machine, it lead to unemployment. For example, a work is...
^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...re not give quality work like artisans, who are produce unique items. All in All, I ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, for example, in general, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98753894081 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69602366263 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619937694704 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2441319259 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9444444444 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109445999662 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307655650509 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303572895172 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658887516338 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254610370382 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.