Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world's fuel resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that the majority of people like to travel by airplane because it would be a thrilling experience. Some people concur that air transportation is responsible for air pollution as well as it's use large amount of fossile fules, so it should be controlled. However, I quibble from them and propound that restricting air travel would solve some problems, but it would be lead to many other problems. In this essay, I will cite light on importance of air travel and it's some environmental effects before a logical conclusion is reached.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of aviation which plays crucial role in human lives. The top-notch concrete reason is that many world economy's entirely dependent on tourism and it is a back bone of economy development. Numerous tourism business such as hotels and leisure centres rely on tourists. Another rationale reason which hauls me to patron is that people can learn about different culture and tradition by roaming around the world. To uphold my notion, I quote an instance of Indian culture and tradition which is world-wide famous just because of intercultural exchanges between countries. The rear most coherent factor which cannot be neglected is that people can save their quality time by traveling airways and it would be very important for business meeting.
What is half for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that aviation is accountable for air pollution and also liable to use too much oils which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that airplane produce carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide and many harmful gases which dangerous for all living animals. However, toxic gases are also produced by cars and many private vehicles. So instead of restricting the air travel, we should encourage people to use public transportation.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting the air transportation because it has edge over it's demerits. However, it's contrary can be controlled. Consequently, I firmly disagree with the given notion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ir pollution and also liable to use too much oils which has multifarious reasons. To...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23714285714 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85186512547 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591428571429 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1921498574 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.833333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267298424377 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766973282667 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655834514576 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151476464688 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755751020066 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.