In some countries prisoners are allowed comfortable accommodation, good food, and healthcare. Do you think this is appropriate? To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your position.
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that the most of individuals being criminal because they do not have basic facilities which helps them to survive. Some people concur that government should not give these types of means to prisoners. However, I quibble from them and propound that criminal is also human so, we provide them basal needs.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of the fundamental facilities for prisoners. The top-notch concrete reason is that criminal mostly comes from poverty and because of these condition they have to put their foot into crime world. If authority provide them best facilities and also good behavior to them, then there will be chances to change them into well human being. Another rational reason which hauls me to patron is that if government do not provide them best resources, then they may be become more violent and we also stripping fundamental needs from them. So as a human, we cannot forget our humanity and we must provide that basic needs to them. Such as accommodation, well food, and healthcare facilities.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that prisoners are not eligible to that types of resources because they are culprit of our society which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that if authority provide that types of means to them then its totally waste of money. They also uphold that government should use these money on development of society.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting to fundamental rights of prisoners. Consequently, I firmly agree to the given statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the individuals') or simply say ''most individuals''.
Suggestion: most of the individuals; most individuals
... world, it is undoubtedly true that the most of individuals being criminal because they do not have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'them the best'.
Suggestion: them the best
... into crime world. If authority provide them best facilities and also good behavior to th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'them the best'.
Suggestion: them the best
...on is that if government do not provide them best resources, then they may be become more...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...rovide that types of means to them then its totally waste of money. They also uphol...
^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
... also uphold that government should use these money on development of society. All in Al...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, then, well, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09252669039 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68997247674 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55871886121 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.783037494 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855241760096 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317740367905 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263213824632 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542750207506 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00884092011738 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.