The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that each and every persons want to live healthy lifestyle; with the help of advanced medical treatments it is become possible. Some people concur that in the future life expectancy will decrease that of today's life. However, I quibble from them and propound that life span will be increased by new medical science and proper personal health care. This essay intends to analyse some reasons behind my perspective before a logical conclusion is reached.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of healthier life and its possibility. The top-notch concrete reason is that today people have become more health conscious and they give more attention on their health. To uphold my notion I would quote an instance of people around me, they ignore junk foods and enjoy daily exercise in order to live healthy life. Another rationale which hauls me to patron is that medical advancement is increasing day by day; so in the upcoming days people will get better health care services than today's medical facilities. The rearmost coherent factor to be considered is that today government is implementing many steps to curb the future health problems. For example, authority encourage the public to do exercise, eat traditional foods ect. Hence, it is unquestionable to say that people's health will improve in the future.
Nevertheless what is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that inhabitants health is likely to be lower in the future which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that nowadays we are facing many environment problems like pollution and global warming that affect people's health; that is why people health and life expectancy will be decreased. In addition, they also uphold that medical science only provide treatments, but if people are not become aware about their health then diagnosis will not help them. So it is like to say that prevention is better than cure.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting my side that people's health is likely to increase in the future. However, its contrary can be controlled or overlooked. Consequently, I firmly disagree with those who say that people health will decrease with time.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...coherent factor to be considered is that today government is implementing many st...
^^
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
... public to do exercise, eat traditional foods ect. Hence, it is unquestionable to say...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...s health will improve in the future. Nevertheless what is half full for some, may appear ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inhabitants'' or 'inhabitant's'?
Suggestion: inhabitants'; inhabitant's
...lic in general tend to distinguish that inhabitants health is likely to be lower in the fut...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, then, for example, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15039577836 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6827195433 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572559366755 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0966578717 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.736842105 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208733567216 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651600087142 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036479427484 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135283123852 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304338716097 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...coherent factor to be considered is that today government is implementing many st...
^^
Line 3, column 787, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
... public to do exercise, eat traditional foods ect. Hence, it is unquestionable to say...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...s health will improve in the future. Nevertheless what is half full for some, may appear ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inhabitants'' or 'inhabitant's'?
Suggestion: inhabitants'; inhabitant's
...lic in general tend to distinguish that inhabitants health is likely to be lower in the fut...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, then, for example, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15039577836 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6827195433 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572559366755 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0966578717 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.736842105 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208733567216 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651600087142 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036479427484 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135283123852 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304338716097 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.