In this twenty-first century, technology has revolutionised every aspect of life, from transportation to food vending machines, everything has become automated. Even, machines are present in home which had made working uncomplicated. However, merits of this advancement outweigh its drawbacks.
To commence with, elevation in machines in daily work has numerous benefits. First of all, time and energy of an individual is saved, which can be utilised in other imperative tasks. People can complete work in less time and more efficiently, reducing work pressure, and providing time to rejuvenate themselves. Also, the quality of work done is better and machines and accuracy is almost hundred percent. For instance, nowadays house hold chores like dish washing, cleaning floor and garden trimming are carried out with assistance of various gadgets, which not only saves time and energy but also do it more precisely. Hence, upgrades in technology are highly beneficial.
Besides this, when energy is saved people get chance to go out and interact with different people in society. Their social skills have become better, which is demand of this contemporary world, as most of employers consider it as a mandatory requirement. Nevertheless, despite of multifarious advantages there are few negative points. Well if it saves time, on other hand physical activity of masses is also diminished. They are relied on machines for each and every task, which eventually is leading to serious health issues such as cardiac diseases, increased cholestrole and obesity. Deducing, over dependence on any technology is dangerous.
In conclusion, modern machines as I aforementioned has reduced work load and saves time, but excess of anything is bad. Thus, these should only be used in controlled manner then all the disadvantages can be overcome.
In the past ,people used to
In the past ,people used to do daily activities on their own, as the time changed the way of living also changed, now a days we are using electronic equipment’s like washing machine, hand-held mixer, vacuum cleaner etc. By using these we can save time and do some productive work. Every coin has two faces, there are some cons also, by utilising these home appliances alot of energy is consumed.
Firstly, let's discuss the positive traits, in this modern world women are also going to work, it is more useful for them so that they can complete the daily chores in time and leave for work. After coming from work they rust switch on the machine and can spend some time with their children and other family members. Secondly, the burden will be reduced to some extent not completely. Previously we used wash our clothes thereto so much of time consuming, but now the machine does 75 percent of the work only drying the clothes part is to be done by us. Every one can buy these products as they became affordable to most of the people.
Moreover, as earlier said these products consume more energy and effecting the environment and creating health problems. For small chores also they are using machines for example, dough maker, it is used to knead the dough, we can knead by ourselves by doing in this way some hand exercise will be there by this blood can circulate to eve, part of the body . Not only this the refrigerator releases Chloro-Floro carbon gases which leads to depletion of ozone layer ,which acts as a barrier between sun and earth, as sun rays contains of Us rays. If this layer is not there then the UV says (Inert fall on human skin which leads to cancel and other skin diseases. However if more energy is consumed there wont be any energy and fuel for our future generations.
I conclude that, depending completely on a machine is not good, a few things we can't avoid but using them appropriately makes life ease,. we need to balance eco-system too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ter and machines and accuracy is almost hundred percent. For instance, nowadays house h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the employers') or simply say ''most employers''.
Suggestion: most of the employers; most employers
...s demand of this contemporary world, as most of employers consider it as a mandatory requirement....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4701754386 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97207688279 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663157894737 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9390007507 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7058823529 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137918449831 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377739905461 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447364884033 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840751731448 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333493442518 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.