There exists an ongoing tendency that young people change their jobs on a regular basis before settling for a longer-lasting or permanent one. This phenomenon can be elaborated by several reasons and I stand by the view that it equally has both drawbacks and positive impacts on the youth.
To commence with, the practice of people usually changing their jobs stems from various motives. The first and foremost convincing explanation is that most young people don’t have a defined career. Most youngsters don’t draw a clear career path for themselves. They tended to choose the same specialties at university with their friends without knowing clearly what that major really is or what their true passion is about. Consequently, they may have no interest in the job they’re working or fail to gain job satisfaction from the jobs that they really hate. Then in the end, they have to try a few ones until they find a desired job. The second worth mentioning is that due to the impracticability of the education systems, especially in Vietnam, what students learn in classes might have no connectivity with what they will work in the future. It is reported in many research findings that the education in Vietnam is just virtually focused on the heavy theoretical knowledge without any applicability. Therefore, fresh graduates are totally shock and lack of the ability to cope with the tasks given at their companies. It leaves them no choice but to voluntarily change their jobs for more career advancement.
I personally opine that this heated trend brings both benefits and detriments. On the positive side, people can benefit from a new job as it gives them chances to gain practical knowledge and meet mixes of different backgrounds who can help them in their future career path. Moreover, new jobs also offer them new motivation to be excited and productive at work again when the old job has become too dull for them. On the slip side, we have to admit that experience gained from old job may be irrelevant to the new job, which turns them to be a newbie. The application process of a new employment can be difficult due to the poor record of previous job retention.
In conclusion, based on the aforementioned discussion, one may conclude that people’ changing- job practice has its own pros and cons, which means that young job seekers have to think twice before making their own decision of finding another career.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, then, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95620437956 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77824150616 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56204379562 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1516380502 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275203751333 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879993050803 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056274436361 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174385328536 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462283058089 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.