Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries.
What are the causes? Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history
Nowadays there is a growing tendency of youngsters knowing much more about movie and music celebrities than historical figures of their nations. There are a number of reasons behind this phenomenon and several solutions should be adopted to improve the situation.
There are two primary reasons why the young generation prefer entertainment stars to national historical heroes. The first reason for this might be the increasing development of technology. In this digital age, a majority of young people have a smartphone or a laptop that allow them to get access to the Internet, where they are able to listen to melodious vocal performances, watch romantic movies or read articles about celebrities’ lives. Furthermore, it is the reality of history education that may lead to poor understanding of students about those who fought for their country’s freedom. In fact, students are forced to learn trite knowledge from textbooks with a large quantity of numbers, names and historical events, which would lead to the fact that they only learn history for exams and rarely remember anything afterwards.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to prevent this problem. Firstly, history lessons should incorporate school trips to historical museums or historical sites in order to diversify learning activities, resulting in the improvement of students’ attitudes towards this subject and the emergence of enthusiasm among them. Moreover, historical movies would be an effective approach to bring learning closer to entertainment. As a result, they can have an insight into the content of the lessons and remember them thoroughly.
For what has been discussed above, we may draw a conclusion that although there are various reasons behind more favour of the young for contemporary entertaining celebrities than for historical figures, several steps could be taken to tackle this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lessons and remember them thoroughly. For what has been discussed above, we ma...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48122866894 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94467065691 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60409556314 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.096716208 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162411437775 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543970661826 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519535515865 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967135417349 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060146868041 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.