Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past.
Why is this case?
Is it positive or negative development?
One of the most discussed issues nowadays is that people today have bigger weddings than in the past and spend on them huge amount of money. In my opinion, while people want to show their happiness and wealth to other people, it is negative development as it leads to tension between spouses and loan burden in the future.
Firstly, it must be admitted that when a couple prepares for wedding they want to show other people that they rich and lover each other. In other words, they tend to rent the most expensive restaurant, invite all friends, classmates and colleagues to their wedding party. In addition they buy expensive clothes and serve tables with expensive dishes. All this show their wealth and means that they could succeed in their life as they can afford all it. Moreover, they hire the most expensive photographers as they want to have beautiful photographs from their weddings in order to share them in the web. As a result, all people will be informed that they had pompous wedding and they are reach.
One serious problem that can arise from having big and expensive weddings is that many people have to spend last money on wedding parties and even some of them take loans from banks. As a result, after wedding day people do not have enough money and have to pay back their loans. Furthermore, the cannot afford to have honeymoon or to buy their own apartments. Consequently, spouses struggle and suffer in order to pay back their loans, as a result, tension between spouses become higher and higher. Consequently, many people cannot survive in such conditions and get divorced.
In conclusion, although people can show that they are successful via wedding, I consider that people may face many problems due to lack of money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...d colleagues to their wedding party. In addition they buy expensive clothes and serve ta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'honeymooned'.
Suggestion: honeymooned
... Furthermore, the cannot afford to have honeymoon or to buy their own apartments. Consequ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, even so, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81395348837 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40872722941 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514950166113 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0014576956 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0768097184383 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313402590403 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443744812822 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548554202983 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629675099962 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.