The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In a few recent years, media has become a particularly important role in human lives since it provides people with both national and international updated news. There is the argument that the media should broadcast more good messages. While I partly agree with this opinion, I also believe that bad news should be put on editorial programs.
On the one hand, a piece of cheerful news should be reported on media channels such as TVs, Radios, newspapers and the Internet as well. The reason which is put forward to explain this view is that good messages have many positive impacts on various aspects of human lives, especially the economy. In fact, a new of reduced debt interest rate in banks which is considered as good information with businesses or corporations will encourage their operations. therefore, these commercial organizations will borrow more amount of money from credit organizations because of the less cost of capital use to invest more in their various activities. As a consequence, the scale and prosperity of the businesses would be improved dramatically, thus generating more profits.
On the other hand, the media should report more good news, which does not mean that bad information is ignored. It is misguided to introduce restrictions on bad messages. Since, although the kind of new can sadden readers as well as listeners, people also need to catch up with the dark sides of daily outside to keep abreast of contemporary issues over the world. In particular, reporting news of natural disasters severely affected by human activities such as climate changes, hurricanes or ecological destructions will not only prevent people from many serious consequences but also raise public’s awareness of the environmental protection. As a result, a lot of useful actions would be undertaken to conserve ecological systems, which allows the condition of the environment to improve considerably.
In conclusion, although many people think that more good things happened should be shown on the media, I broadly agree with this idea. Furthermore, I also think that the media also pay attention to bad information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 601, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ons because of the less cost of capital use to invest more in their various activit...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21407624633 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9544985188 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563049853372 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9866246363 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.533333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274568139017 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101173338676 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932318271143 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184315128105 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200991764002 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.