The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In a few recent years, thanks to the prosperity of technology the media services have been increasingly developing. While some people argue that the content of media should be focused on a number of good information, I partly agree with this opinion but I believe that bad news should also gain more attention.
On the one hand, news which consists of positive contents should be reported on media channels. The reliable reason which is put forward to explain this view is that hearing more positive information will benefit many aspects of human life. A case point can be seen in the economy. In fact, a piece of news that there is a reduced debt interest rate in banks which is considered as good information with businesses or corporations will raise their optimism. It means that these commercial organizations will borrow more amount of money from credit organizations to invest, which in turn improving the scale and prosperity of the businesses.
On the other hand, the media should report more good news, which does not mean that bad information is ignored. Poor news is should be shown on media channels, because, this kind of news can make significant contributions to today’s society. In particular, reporting news of natural disasters such as climate changes, hurricanes or ecological destructions on the media will not only help people prevent from many serious consequences but also raise public’s awareness of the protection of the environment. As a result, a lot of actions would be undertaken to conserve ecological systems, which allows the condition of the environment to improve.
In conclusion, although many people think that more good news should be shown by the media, I broadly agree with this idea. Furthermore, I also think that the media also pay attention to bad information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...t bad information is ignored. Poor news is should be shown on media channels, beca...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also pay attention to bad information.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11409395973 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92642847245 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543624161074 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3374799425 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.230769231 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310783662203 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119713265073 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952006726623 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20568680745 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216585758326 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.