Medical services should be run by profit-making companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that healthcare services which are operated by profit-making organizations should be more popular. Personally, I completely agree that profitable services would bring tremendous advantages to people’s lives.
Firstly, financial health services would strongly enhance doctors' professions by paying them a higher salary. Specifically, when the doctors earn more money, they will be able to take more medical courses to boost their skills. Take Bach Mai hospital in Ha Nam for example. Owing to the lucrative service, the doctors all get a well-paid income, therefore, have extensive knowledge in the medical field. By getting more in-depth courses, those doctors could treat the deadly illness and give more effective prescriptions to the customers. As a result, the life expectancy of Hanam residents has improved greatly. Besides, with a high income, doctors can also take care of their family and have more motivation to try their best at work.
Secondly, medical facilities in the hospitals will be significantly improved if they are supported by money-making companies. While the public hospitals usually have poor equipment, the lucrative services would have better ones. Having such fully-equipped medical machines, softy beds, tidy rooms as the victims would have a firm belief in their curing process. For instance, according to a recent statistic on BBC News, 70% of victims said that being treated with a convenient condition had shortened their recovery process. Therefore, people easily realize that this sort of service not only helps materially but also spiritually, which is extremely important for the victims.
In conclusion, I would argue that society would have more benefits from using the medical services run by profit-making organizations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60516605166 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94285937322 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649446494465 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1183214293 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.266666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182376437541 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646594538405 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722550430482 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150295366496 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837954740091 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.