In modern age, some people think it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Thanks to the development of technology, it is widely believed that computers and digital devices are gradually replacing the traditionally handwriting skills. Therefore, some people consider that it is fruitless to teach children how to write. Personally, I strongly disapprove with this point of view.
To begin with, good handwriting skill is really essential in terms of educational issues. In addition, since most subjects at schools require basic writing skill, adolescents have to use it on a daily basis. For instance, while literature demands kids to thoroughly express their ideas via writing, math also requires students to take notes about numbers. Hence, if teenagers lack the ability to write fluently, they will face with troubles related to schoolwork or assignments, leading to a higher rate of depression and anxiety.
More importantly, allocating time to enhance writing skills helps kids to use their time in a meaningful and effective way. Additionally, it is widely believed that young people tend to engage in indolent activities such as playing games when they are free from study. However, such an overdependence on leisure stuffs may cause great harm to children’s efficiency in study as kids are extremely addicted. For instance, there are many children who live in HCM drop-out schools due to the addiction in electronic gaming. Hence, spending time to learn how to write is an effective solution to tackle this problem, helping kids to totally focus on school related issues
Taking everything into consideration, technological devices cannot replace the necessity of handwriting skills in children’s life. Moreover, writing ability has to be fully taught at school different situations. Hence, I strongly show my disapprovement with this viewpoint.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50909090909 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02987875818 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665454545455 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.015814053 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.214285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114089861302 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040301797417 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523826659561 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765160426136 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344037639885 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.