The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this integration era, whether foreign support with money by thriving nation is an effective solution to poverty is controversial. Although financial help may bring along its merits, I strongly agree with the alternative due to the fact that it probably triggers corruption prevalent and governance mismanagement.
To begin with, financial aid often leads to corruption in many third-world nations. This is because the truth that some governors could not avoid being greedy when receiving a huge amount of money. Therefore, they would try to take advantage of their position to corrupt and the detriment of the national economy would be inevitable. For example, according to an international investigation, the Africa has lost fifty billion USD because of corruptors, having negative impact to the economy of this region. In brief, the bad attitude of politicians is one of factors causing the poverty in some undeveloped nations so giving these people money would never make their countries become richer.
On the other side, governors of several nations are having troubles with the management of supplementary financial sources despite the inefficient strategies. As a result, funds could not be allocated reasonably. Provided that the government of a certain country lavished money for one problem without caring much about another sections, that country would develop unbalanced and keeping on being poor. In summary, even the corruption does not happen, the poverty still occurs due to the wrong strategies in developing.
In conclusion, the foreign aid through monetary support could not really evident its benefits to some nations, so the changes in ways to support would be necessary with the purpose of making the world better together
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, really, so, still, therefore, third, for example, in brief, in conclusion, in summary, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42124542125 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87534821657 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630036630037 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8284088264 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117446389173 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377635564954 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468450766426 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671238949049 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379337133493 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.