Money for postgraduate research is limited. Therefore, some people think financial support from governments should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the budget for conducting research at a postgraduate level is limited. Therefore, it is felt that the government money should only be directed to science-related research instead of equally distributing it to all areas of research. I personally agree with this view for a few reasons.
Admittedly, one might argue that historical research is of great value to the society and thus should be funded decently. Archeological excavations and field studies can provide insights into the past and help explore extinct human civilizations better. The remains of the Maya tribe, for example, can teach valuable lessons on how those early humans lived and thrived. Consequently, those ancient findings seem to pay off the costs of research due to the influx of tourists who are willing to visit those places.
Nevertheless, investment in scientific research tends to have greater impacts than less useful subjects. Firstly, investigations in the field of astronomy can solve the global problem of overpopulation by exploring potentially habitable planets. Secondly, the chemistry research is likely to resolve such pressing issues as famine and soil erosion. In no way should this type of research be underfunded if we want to eliminate hunger, say by improving GM foods through chemistry. Ultimately, to deal with actual incurable diseases, such as HIV, infertility, and cancer, the role of postgraduate biological research is indispensable.
In conclusion, not only can sufficient investment into postgraduate scientific research assist to tackle global problems, but also can impact the future of mankind. Therefore, I believe that more funds should be channeled to this research instead of spending them on less important subjects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48888888889 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13207224425 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2536409735 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349947457787 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111302936041 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679661907108 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213629027501 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850164056105 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.