The money spent by governments on space programmes should be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It was a great journey since human first endeavored to explore the universe. There was countless project afterwards fueled by an enormous budget that aimed at only one purpose: to conquer the outer space. The serious issues within our society, however, have emerged beyond the expectations that demanded an urgent support from national capital. From my point of view, a solution in which the governments could balance their financial resource used for both space programmes and social services is the most optimal option.
On the one hand, the breakthroughs in field of space have changed series of aspects of human life, especially in positive trend. In fact, the Cold War witnessed a race that consumed an incredible budget among superpowers to serve only one purpose: to fly human to the outer space. This move laid a foundation to establish a net of satellite that aim to optimize the processing and transferring information. Thanks to millions of gigabytes of information are being encrypted per second, our communicating has changed forever. For example, Google map, an application developed based on the source of signal sent directly from the outer satellites to user’s devices, did change our transporting at its root. Such magnificent application allows its users to navigate exactly their destination with the most efficient route. Besides, satellite cloud images also improved the accuracy in forecasting severe disasters that aim to reduce the damage to the lowest level. Furthermore, the most precious legacy of space projects is the comprehensive perception about our planet's status. Neil Armstrong, in the historic moment of landing to the moon, had looked back to the Earth for the first time in human's history and realized how beautiful and fragile it is. Since then, there was countless campaign to change our awareness about environmental crises. In this light, space programs deserves the money invested.
On another aspect, emerging issues within our society are in desperate need of being tackled. The issues, without an appropriate solution from the administration, could affect our next generations negatively, or even worse, to trigger the irreconcilable conflicts inside a country. For example, the migrant caravan storming at US border in recent days forced president Trump administration to pay attention in both financial and human resources to deal with. Moreover, the early years of 21 century have witnessed the most serious crises so far in many fields such as pollution, population, and territory dispute. For instance, researching for a treatment against new kinds of virus whose genetic system mutation consumed billions of dollars in the first step, and will need billions of dollars to install them in practice. Opponents of space projects have the right to question for they condemned politicians to use space research capital to build up their own reputations as well as to drive a race to nothing on global scale. Hence, it is righteous to call for an adequate solution from government in using national budget.
In conclusion, we spend billions of dollars to find life on other planet and trillions for dollars killing the life on the Earth. However, it is inevitable that the benefits from space projects are the huge profits few could argue with. Therefore, I believe that to balance financial resource in investing both space programs and vital public services is the most adequate solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...l with. Moreover, the early years of 21 century have witnessed the most serious crises ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 41.998997996 219% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2903.0 1615.20841683 180% => OK
No of words: 549.0 315.596192385 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28779599271 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83009234175 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 176.041082164 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575591985428 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 909.0 506.74238477 179% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8515121971 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.12 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.96 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.32 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0877689578449 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258106869048 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324454452271 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608322986214 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153795069302 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 174.0 78.4519038076 222% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.