Mony onimol species in lhe world ore becorning exlincl nowodoys.
Some people say lhot counlries ond individuols shoutd profecf fhese
onimals from dying ouL while olhers soy we should concenfrofe more
on problems of humon beings. Discuss bolh views ond give your
opinion.
ln the past few decades, animal extinction has become rampant because of human activity. Therefore, some
people opine that it is imperative to save these dying species, whereas others believe in focusing more on
human problems. This essay shall look into both perspectives. l, however, side with the former view.
Conserving endangered species is essential, as they are part of our ecological chain. The removal of a single
species can set off a chain reaction affecting many others. For example, the gray wolf was once on the verge of
extinction, but has now been restored to Yellowstone National Park. These grey wolves control the growing
population of elk, which had been over consuming the trees that grew along streams. These trees are now
cooling the stream water, which is benefitting native trout. These trees are also the habitat for migratory birds.
Beavers now have willow branches to eat, and beaver dams create marshland habitat for otters, mink, and
ducks. So, it can be seen that saving one species has led to benefit many other species, which would have
otherwise also gone into extinction.
Another benefit of conserving endangered animals is their contribution to the field of medicine. Each living thing
contains a unique reservoir of genetic material that cannot be retrieved or duplicated if lost. More than a
quarter of all prescriptions written annually in the United States contain chemicals discovered in plants and
animals.
Furthermore, many species of animals are benefitting agriculture. Farmers are using insects and other animals
that prey on certain crop pests, as well as using plants containing natural-toxins that repel harmful insects. They
are a safe, effective, and less expensive alternative to synthetic chemicals. Therefore, each and every species
has its own unique value and so should be saved.
On the other hand, in some nations, especially developing countries, human beings are still suffering from
poverty, famine, epidemics and natural disasters. lf the limited government budget is allocated to animal
conservation, many people will face huge difficulty making a living. Therefore, many people believe that
protecting basic human rights should be the top priority of these countries.
ln conclusion, protecting wildlife is of great significance, as it is a vital cornerstone of the survival and future
development of mankind. However, the funds allocated for animal conservation should not come at the cost of
basic needs of humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ln
ln the past few decades, animal extinction...
^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: L
...ssay shall look into both perspectives. l, however, side with the former view. C...
^
Line 8, column 62, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ter, which is benefitting native trout. These trees are also the habitat for migrator...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 51, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lf
...amine, epidemics and natural disasters. lf the limited government budget is alloca...
^^
Line 24, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ln
...e the top priority of these countries. ln conclusion, protecting wildlife is of g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46173469388 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79570305852 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627551020408 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6431675683 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2083333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.38176352705 571% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0858791246003 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227057348086 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266109267801 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0223886636389 0.151304729494 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245889407208 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.