More and more people buy and use their own car. Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals overweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
With the rapid development of recent society, cars become an essential vehicle for every single person. Some people state that the increasing number of using private cars eventually caused some serious environmental issues. This essay will delve into the evidence and argue why the con for the environment outweigh the pro of using private cars.
On the one hand, using a private car is beneficial to the folks in several aspects. To begin with, the use of cars make people’s lives more convenience that they can manage their time more efficient. Which they do not need to concern about the time of public transportation, they would drive out any time they wish. Besides, someplace such as the rural area of Australia, a car is necessary for every family because without that their daily lives will suffer. For instance, most of the shopping malls are located in the crowed location because of the operational matter, these will result in people to use private cars if they living in remote areas.
On the other hand, the natural environment will suffer from the growth of the use of private cars. Global warming and air pollution are mainly caused by fumes emissions which private cars are contributed a large proportion to it. According to the studies by scientists, global warming triggers some terrible consequence such as melting glories, species extinction and chronic disease. Another inevitable fact is the exhaust of non-renewable energy such as fossil fuels. Because to meet the rising demand for fuels in order to run cars, more and more fossil fuels are explored from the ground such as natural gas and oil. Deforestation is unpreventable due to such energy exploration and it also leads to some species extinction because of the loss of their habitats.
In conclusion, despite cars are considerably convenient to people’s lives, it has triggered some significant consequence to the natural environment. From my point of view, I believe that the benefit of using private cars is far less than the disadvantaged effect in the natural environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15339233038 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79705132967 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554572271386 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5736938721 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.1875 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255551868716 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806560366235 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059979839613 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149733038151 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503370271935 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.