More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is negative or positive development?
As the population becomes increasingly competitive, it is argued that a growing number of city residents live in modest accommodations or without outdoor zones. While there are several opinions, I assume the advantages outweigh the drawbacks.
There are some clearly adverse impacts that remain on these inmates. It is necessary to do exercises after a whole day of sitting down and using intelligent devices; however, lacking space leads to making light of gymnastics for both adults and children. Researchers demonstrate that this situation limits physical and mental development, chiefly kids. Furthermore, a claustrophobic site harms the human mindset if there is no greenery around their living environment. Indeed, it is unsuitable for significant families with at least five members when combining rooms is an obligatory condition, and each partner will have less private space.
On the other hand, according to the growing number of citizens in metropolises, it is seen that there is insufficient dwelling for all, so governments erect numerous apartments to deal with this issue. This type of building is specialized for lower-class and impoverished students with limited budgets or unsecured income due to the affordable price of the property. With little space, they are not just saving money for purchasing houses but also trimming monthly expenses, namely utility bills for electricity, water, and air-conditioning. In fact, there are various couples, small-scale nuclear families, and living-alone communities that also opted for flats.
In addition, excepting financial problems, a smaller residence would be appropriate for those who enjoy a simple, frugal, and blissfully stress-free lifestyle. Its size allows the owner to reduce frivolous items to optimize space and productivity. By taking full advantage of it, these dwellers can spend less time cleaning and taking care of the furniture to concentrate on their other work.
In brief, I strongly opine that this kind of living is a functional invention for overpopulation because of immigration and the progressively natural birth rate. Practically, to restrict disadvantages, the authorities have invested in parks and other public spaces, encouraging outdoor activities for society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, at least, in addition, in brief, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70206489676 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1649869211 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693215339233 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.791912817 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8125 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114977542257 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329981294059 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281912097771 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582521132826 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257736213025 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.