The way modern people work nowadays may give a rise in the popular belief that it is the main factor leading to the increased stress of inhabitants. While i partly agree with the detrimental impacts of modern working on people, i am firmly of the view that there are more important reasons which should be blamed for the growing level of stress rates among citizens. A few reasons will be discussed before some feasible measures are recommended to tackle this heated issue.
On the one hand, no one can deny the fact that stress is subjective to the heavy workload to some extent. Currently, the modern work environment is very flexible and certainly more demanding in many ways due to increased global competition and the desire to satisfy consumers instantly. This creates the need for fast, flexible working practices in order to respond to such demand. Technology and mobility are possible the greatest drivers of change in the workplace at the moment. The ability to work from home or in the field by accessing data and resources using smartphones, tablets and laptops, means that many people do not have such a structured work schedule anymore. They may be on call or available to their clients or customers for a greater part of each day. As there is no escape from always- on connectivity, workers now can never get away from their work and problems. Even when they are on a vacation, few people can resist the temptation to check their work emails. In addition, modern citizens tend to devote virtually their whole of work to ensure material well- being, which means that they may spend less time to gather together with their family to wind down, especially when the work timing is different. That drives people to feel lonely or stressful since they get no assistance from their beloved ones in the crisis time.
On the other hand, i personally opine that personal activities should be recognized as a more crucial factor making people vulnerable to lots of pressure. People now show a tendency of immersing themselves in social networks rather than real- life circle of friends. Moreover, while in the past, people enjoyed outdoor or kinesthetic activities, modern people prefer spending time on their Ipads or smartphones. It has been reported in many research findings that the lack of real world relationship and physical exercises can add to the feelings of being stressed.
As serious as the problem may seem, some definite actions can be taken to address this problem. The key to beat stress is to look for meaning in life. Instead of rushing after material gains, we should look inward and connect with our own nature. Setting priorities is equally necessary. We should ask ourselves what we want to achieve in life and head towards them at our own pace. Besides, i think a good therapy could also be doing some yoga, going to the gym, having a good massage and why not go for a small break.
In conclusion, even though the work pressure and people's daily habit make modern people stress out a lot, the issue could be bridged if we thought positively and did not give stress the power of being a part in our lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...al impacts of modern working on people, i am firmly of the view that there are mo...
^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... towards them at our own pace. Besides, i think a good therapy could also be doin...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2600.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 542.0 315.596192385 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79704797048 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50333310848 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 176.041082164 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557195571956 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.486728179 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237602496401 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602511405171 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351723403574 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127789133697 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323188815861 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.