More and more people want to own famous brands of cars, clothes and other items. What are the reasons for this? Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, well-know brands become very developed, more and more common in society. Personally, I think there are various reasons why people tend to use famous brands and also bring both positive and negative problems.
Beyond questions, there are numerous reasons for using too much famous brands. First of all, well-know brands also bring good quality items. In fact, people could spend a huge amount of money to buy highly quality and use for long term instead of purchasing some items that are cheap, low quality, always fixing or broken. Secondly, using famous brands could stand for high social status. It should be noted that there are more using famous brands, the higher social class will be showed. To cite an example, when people have a meeting with partner, wearing high-end clothes could bring good impression for other people and have positive effect for their works.
On the other hands, buying famous brands could bring both positive and negative development. Firstly, people tend to use famous brands, which could help enhance the quality of production, ignore fake items and low quality. Besides, it could bring big profit for government because tax is contributed. By contrast, there are many people who do not have money and low income, however they still want to use well-know brands. As a result, it lead to many problems for government such as the criminal rate is increase by kidnapping, pickpocket, and the like. In China, some teenager sold their kidney to buy IPhone or Ipad, as an example.
To conclusion, owning many famous brands is from many reasons, however the most common reason is good quality of products. Therefore, it could bring many positive and negative development for government and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 440, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...o use well-know brands. As a result, it lead to many problems for government such as...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, i think, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14736842105 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37638427365 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8697912777 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286884208671 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985173756311 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585457119565 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195881375866 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489350025032 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.